Page values for "The case for staying on"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeSeptember 19, 2006 3:40:14 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeSeptember 19, 2006 3:40:14 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The Economist editorial board |source=The Economist |date=August 10, 2006 |url=http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_SNSSDQS |quote="But, however badly America may have conducted its post-war plan for Iraq, it would be a shameful dereliction of duty if it ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringThe case for staying on
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger1,981
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger1,981
_pageNamePageThe case for staying on
_pageTitleString

The case for staying on

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPagePost-invasion Iraq
Position_fragmentStringCoalition troops should pull out
PositionPagePost-invasion Iraq / Coalition troops should pull out
Position_linkWikitext

Coalition troops should pull out

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Economist editorial board
SourcePageThe Economist
DateDateAugust 10, 2006
URLURLhttp://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_SNSSDQS
QuoteText"But, however badly America may have conducted its post-war plan for Iraq, it would be a shameful dereliction of duty if it were to leave because voters, in Connecticut or elsewhere, lose heart."
SummaryWikitext

The case for staying on by The Economist editorial board (The Economist, August 10, 2006) (view)