The United Nations and Darfur: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}


{{opinion|Darfur conflict|United States should send peacekeepers|for}}
{{opinion|Darfur conflict|NATO should intervene|for}}

Latest revision as of 03:42, October 3, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New Republic editorial board
Source The New Republic
Date September 1, 2006
URL http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060911&s=editorial091106
Quote
Quotes-start.png "We could have chosen another path. We could have bypassed the maddeningly slow U.N. machinery, assembled a coalition of allies under the banner of nato, and dispatched troops to Darfur ourselves--without consent from, or apologies to, the men in Khartoum who orchestrated this evil. The United States could have led the way. We still could." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position NATO should intervene on the topic Darfur conflict.