The U.S. House should reject the health care bill and start over

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Seattle Times editorial board
Source The Seattle Times
Date March 15, 2010
URL http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2011354314_edit16healthinsurance.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Extending coverage is good, but if Congress is going to offer the people a new benefit, it has to squeeze out at least the equivalent amount of savings. If it does not, then health care, already gulping down 17 percent of national economic output, increases its caloric intake even more. And that means a heavier cost loaded onto each new Boeing 787, Kenworth truck or other product American companies sell. And that hinders recovery." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.