Difference between revisions of "The Right Type of 'Surge'"

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removed outdated template)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{item
 
{{item
|author=Jack Keane
+
|author=Jack Keane, Frederick W. Kagan
 
|source=The Washington Post
 
|source=The Washington Post
 
|date=December 27, 2006
 
|date=December 27, 2006
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|quote="We need to cut through the confusion. Bringing security to Baghdad -- the essential precondition for political compromise, national reconciliation and economic development -- is possible only with a surge of at least 30,000 combat troops lasting 18 months or so. Any other option is likely to fail."
 
|quote="We need to cut through the confusion. Bringing security to Baghdad -- the essential precondition for political compromise, national reconciliation and economic development -- is possible only with a surge of at least 30,000 combat troops lasting 18 months or so. Any other option is likely to fail."
 
}}
 
}}
{{additional_author|Frederick W. Kagan}}
 
 
{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should increase troop levels|for}}
 
{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should increase troop levels|for}}

Latest revision as of 18:01, September 30, 2008

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jack Keane, Frederick W. Kagan
Source The Washington Post
Date December 27, 2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/26/AR2006122600773.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "We need to cut through the confusion. Bringing security to Baghdad -- the essential precondition for political compromise, national reconciliation and economic development -- is possible only with a surge of at least 30,000 combat troops lasting 18 months or so. Any other option is likely to fail." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should increase troop levels on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.