The Right Troops in the Right Places: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Is this too many positions?)
(Better quote)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
|date=September 15, 2006
|date=September 15, 2006
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/opinion/15moulton.html
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/opinion/15moulton.html
|quote="Both problems with our current strategy — not waiting for Iraqi forces to be ready, and consolidating our bases at the expense of classic counterinsurgency tactics like small adviser teams — emanate from the overriding concern for bringing the troops home."
|quote="While consolidating bases is a short-term way to reduce troop requirements, fielding more adviser teams will eventually allow more Americans to come home. American troops embedded with the Iraqis they train usually require less support than conventional units; many rely on the Iraqis for food, shelter and basic defenses. Green Berets in 12-man teams have already replaced entire battalions of conventional forces in some Iraqi cities."
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 15:30, October 10, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Seth Moulton
Source The New York Times
Date September 15, 2006
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/opinion/15moulton.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "While consolidating bases is a short-term way to reduce troop requirements, fielding more adviser teams will eventually allow more Americans to come home. American troops embedded with the Iraqis they train usually require less support than conventional units; many rely on the Iraqis for food, shelter and basic defenses. Green Berets in 12-man teams have already replaced entire battalions of conventional forces in some Iraqi cities." Quotes-end.png

The following other items refer to this item: Are We Winning in Iraq?

Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Coalition troops should pull out on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.


This item argues for the position United States should change its approach on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.


This item argues against the position United States should increase troop levels on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.