The Right Troops in the Right Places: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Is this too many positions?) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Better quote) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=September 15, 2006 | |date=September 15, 2006 | ||
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/opinion/15moulton.html | |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/opinion/15moulton.html | ||
|quote=" | |quote="While consolidating bases is a short-term way to reduce troop requirements, fielding more adviser teams will eventually allow more Americans to come home. American troops embedded with the Iraqis they train usually require less support than conventional units; many rely on the Iraqis for food, shelter and basic defenses. Green Berets in 12-man teams have already replaced entire battalions of conventional forces in some Iraqi cities." | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:30, October 10, 2006
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Seth Moulton |
---|---|
Source | The New York Times |
Date | September 15, 2006 |
URL | http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/opinion/15moulton.html |
Quote |
The following other items refer to this item: Are We Winning in Iraq?
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Coalition troops should pull out on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.
This item argues for the position United States should change its approach on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.
This item argues against the position United States should increase troop levels on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.