The Republican case for ratifying New START

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Colin Powell
Source The Washington Post
Date December 2, 2010
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120104598.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "First, the agreement emphasizes verification, providing a valuable window into Russia's nuclear arsenal. Since the original START expired last December, Russia has not been required to provide notifications about changes in its strategic nuclear arsenal, and the United States has been unable to conduct on-site inspections. Each day, America's understanding of Russia's arsenal has been degraded, and resources have been diverted from national security tasks to try to fill the gaps." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Treaty should be ratified on the topic New START.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=The_Republican_case_for_ratifying_New_START&oldid=13539"