Page values for "The Constitution Trumps Arizona"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateJuly 13, 2010 11:43:26 AM
_modificationDateJuly 13, 2010 11:43:26 AM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=July 7, 2010 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/08/opinion/08thu1.html |quote="The Supreme Court has said federal authority can pre-empt state law when the federal interest is dominant and where there already ex ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectThe Constitution Trumps Arizona

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorThe New York Times editorial board
SourceThe New York Times
DateJuly 7, 2010
URLhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/08/opinion/08thu1.html
Quote"The Supreme Court has said federal authority can pre-empt state law when the federal interest is dominant and where there already exists a system of federal regulations. The government has done a poor job enforcing its immigration rules, to say the least, but they do exist, and clearly fall under what the Constitution calls “the supreme law of the land.”"
Summary

The Constitution Trumps Arizona by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, July 7, 2010) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicUnited States of America v. Arizona
Position_fragmentLawsuit was justified
PositionUnited States of America v. Arizona / Lawsuit was justified
Position_link

Lawsuit was justified

Stancefor