Page values for "Supreme Court takes us backwards as a nation by overturning Roe v. Wade"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeJuly 20, 2022 2:44:22 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeJuly 20, 2022 2:44:22 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=Chicago Sun-Times editorial board |source=Chicago Sun-Times |date=June 24, 2022 |url=https://chicago.suntimes.com/2022/6/24/23181677/gutting-reproductive-rights-supreme-court-backwards-nation-abortion-roe-wade-editorial |quote=The court’s decision was issued a day after the conserva ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringSupreme Court takes us backwards as a nation by overturning Roe v. Wade
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger14,283
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger14,283
_pageNamePageSupreme Court takes us backwards as a nation by overturning Roe v. Wade
_pageTitleString

Supreme Court takes us backwards as a nation by overturning Roe v. Wade

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,Chicago Sun-Times editorial board
SourcePageChicago Sun-Times
DateDateJune 24, 2022
URLURLhttps://chicago.suntimes.com/2022/6/24/23181677/gutting-reproductive-rights-supreme-court-backwards-nation-abortion-roe-wade-editorial
QuoteTextThe court’s decision was issued a day after the conservative majority struck down a New York law limiting the right to carry guns in public. The message is clear: The right to own and carry deadly weapons is more important to uphold than the rights of women to make their own decisions on whether to carry a pregnancy to term.
SummaryWikitext

Supreme Court takes us backwards as a nation by overturning Roe v. Wade by Chicago Sun-Times editorial board (Chicago Sun-Times, June 24, 2022) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst