Difference between revisions of "Settle trade war: U.S., China need to find a resolution soon"

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board |source=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette |date=September 27, 2019 |url=https://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/editorials/2019/09/27...")
 
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|quote=Additionally, such shifting of production out of China means a likely loss of market share in China and that exited U.S.-owned factories would be gobbled up at fire-sale prices. And intellectual property or proprietary practices likely would be illegally grabbed by the new owner.
 
|quote=Additionally, such shifting of production out of China means a likely loss of market share in China and that exited U.S.-owned factories would be gobbled up at fire-sale prices. And intellectual property or proprietary practices likely would be illegally grabbed by the new owner.
 
}}
 
}}
{{Opinion|China–United States trade war|Trade war is good for the United States|for}}
+
{{Opinion|China–United States trade war|Trade war is good for the United States|against}}

Latest revision as of 18:12, October 14, 2019

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board
Source Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Date September 27, 2019
URL https://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/editorials/2019/09/27/US-China-trade-resolution-settle/stories/201909260030
Quote
Quotes-start.png Additionally, such shifting of production out of China means a likely loss of market share in China and that exited U.S.-owned factories would be gobbled up at fire-sale prices. And intellectual property or proprietary practices likely would be illegally grabbed by the new owner. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Trade war is good for the United States on the topic China–United States trade war.