Page values for "Science, Not Speculation"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeApril 16, 2007 7:05:33 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeApril 16, 2007 7:05:33 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=April 13, 2007 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/12/AR2007041202072.html |quote="It failed to get the two-thirds majority in either chamber of Congress that it would need to over ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringScience, Not Speculation
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger3,316
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger3,316
_pageNamePageScience, Not Speculation
_pageTitleString

Science, Not Speculation

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageStem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007
Position_fragmentStringAct should be passed
PositionPageStem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007 / Act should be passed
Position_linkWikitext

Act should be passed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Washington Post editorial board
SourcePageThe Washington Post
DateDateApril 13, 2007
URLURLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/12/AR2007041202072.html
QuoteText"It failed to get the two-thirds majority in either chamber of Congress that it would need to overcome President Bush's expected veto. That alone was disappointing. But also frustrating was much of the debate in the Senate, which was colored by presumptuous readings of early scientific data and policymaking by anecdote."
SummaryWikitext

Science, Not Speculation by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, April 13, 2007) (view)