Ruling for the Law: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
("The")
("e)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{item
|author=The New York Times Editorial Staff
|author=The New York Times editorial board
|source=The New York Times
|source=The New York Times
|date=8/18/2006
|date=8/18/2006

Latest revision as of 21:05, August 28, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date 8/18/2006
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/18/opinion/18fri1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But for now, with a careful, thoroughly grounded opinion, one judge in Michigan has done what 535 members of Congress have so abysmally failed to do. She has reasserted the rule of law over a lawless administration and shown why issues of this kind belong within the constitutional process created more than two centuries ago to handle them." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional on the topic NSA warrantless surveillance controversy.