Page values for "Return of due process"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateSeptember 28, 2006 3:49:20 PM
_modificationDateDecember 3, 2007 5:09:29 AM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{item |author=San Francisco Chronicle editorial board |source=San Francisco Chronicle |date=June 30, 2006 |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/30/EDGDOILNJ71.DTL |quote="Much like the so-called "Patriot Act," the tribunals were created in haste following the ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions2
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectReturn of due process

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorSan Francisco Chronicle editorial board
SourceSan Francisco Chronicle
DateJune 30, 2006
URLhttp://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/30/EDGDOILNJ71.DTL
Quote"Much like the so-called "Patriot Act," the tribunals were created in haste following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. In that traumatic time, Congress was unwilling to challenge the president's call for such wide-ranging security measures. But there is no excuse for the Pentagon's treatment of the estimated 750 detainees, who have been held in the U.S. military prison in Cuba since 2002. Reports show our military using torture-like treatments such as solitary confinement, exposure to extreme temperatures and sleep-depriving noise and light. "
Summary

Return of due process by San Francisco Chronicle editorial board (San Francisco Chronicle, June 30, 2006) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicHamdan v. Rumsfeld
Position_fragmentSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionHamdan v. Rumsfeld / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_link

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

Stancefor