Republican integrity: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Global replace - 'http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed' to 'http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed')
 
Line 3: Line 3:
|source=The Washington Times
|source=The Washington Times
|date=10/4/2006
|date=10/4/2006
|url=http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20061003-084828-8511r.htm
|url=http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20061003-084828-8511r.htm
|quote="In this case, defending Denny Hastert's decisions is ethically wrong, would undermine our party's commitment to the defense of traditional moral values and is politically stupid in the bargain."
|quote="In this case, defending Denny Hastert's decisions is ethically wrong, would undermine our party's commitment to the defense of traditional moral values and is politically stupid in the bargain."
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 16:37, July 16, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Tony Blankley
Source The Washington Times
Date 10/4/2006
URL http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20061003-084828-8511r.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png "In this case, defending Denny Hastert's decisions is ethically wrong, would undermine our party's commitment to the defense of traditional moral values and is politically stupid in the bargain." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Dennis Hastert should resign as House Speaker on the topic Mark Foley scandal.


This item refers to the previous opinion item Resign, Mr. Speaker.