Rejecting the Keystone pipeline is an act of insanity

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 21:31, February 25, 2015 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Robert J. Samuelson, |source=The Washington Post |date=January 19, 2012 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/rejecting-the-keystone-pipeline-is-an-act-of...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Robert J. Samuelson
Source The Washington Post
Date January 19, 2012
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/rejecting-the-keystone-pipeline-is-an-act-of-insanity/2012/01/19/gIQAowG6AQ_story.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png The big winners are the Chinese. They must be celebrating their good fortune and wondering how the crazy Americans could repudiate such a huge supply of nearby energy. There’s no guarantee that tar-sands oil will go to China; pipelines to the Pacific would have to be built. But it creates the possibility when the oil’s natural market is the United States. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Pipeline should be built on the topic Keystone XL pipeline.