Reject Obama's request to attack Syria

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:30, September 8, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Denver Post editorial board, |source=The Denver Post |date=September 6, 2013 |url=http://www.denverpost.com/politics/ci_24026572/reject-obamas-request-atta...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Denver Post editorial board
Source The Denver Post
Date September 6, 2013
URL http://www.denverpost.com/politics/ci_24026572/reject-obamas-request-attack-syria
Quote
Quotes-start.png During the pressure of the 2012 campaign, Obama made rash and amateurish statements about those weapons being a "red line" for the U.S., but Congress is not obliged to bail him out. Nor must Congress pretend that gassing civilians, as horrifying as that is, is any more despicable than bombing them by the thousands or crushing them with tanks. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.