Page values for "Reject Obama's request to attack Syria"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateSeptember 8, 2013 4:30:26 PM
_modificationDateSeptember 8, 2013 4:30:26 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=The Denver Post editorial board, |source=The Denver Post |date=September 6, 2013 |url=http://www.denverpost.com/politics/ci_24026572/reject-obamas-request-attack-syria |quote=During the pressure of the 2012 campaign, Obama made rash and amateurish statements about those weapons being ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectReject Obama's request to attack Syria

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorThe Denver Post editorial board
SourceThe Denver Post
DateSeptember 6, 2013
URLhttp://www.denverpost.com/politics/ci_24026572/reject-obamas-request-attack-syria
QuoteDuring the pressure of the 2012 campaign, Obama made rash and amateurish statements about those weapons being a "red line" for the U.S., but Congress is not obliged to bail him out. Nor must Congress pretend that gassing civilians, as horrifying as that is, is any more despicable than bombing them by the thousands or crushing them with tanks.
Summary

Reject Obama's request to attack Syria by The Denver Post editorial board (The Denver Post, September 6, 2013) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicSyrian civil war
Position_fragmentUnited States should intervene
PositionSyrian civil war / United States should intervene
Position_link

United States should intervene

Stanceagainst