Reform That Has Really Paid Off: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Item | ||
|author=Norman J. Ornstein | |author=Norman J. Ornstein, Anthony Corrado | ||
|source=The Washington Post | |source=The Washington Post | ||
|date=April 1, 2007 | |date=April 1, 2007 | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="We thought the law would produce a flowering of grass-roots party activity, a resurgence of small donors and a reduction in the sale of access to elected officials in return for campaign funds -- and a decrease in the shakedowns of donors that this practice induced. But we thought it would take several election cycles for the changes to take root. Instead this happened immediately." | |quote="We thought the law would produce a flowering of grass-roots party activity, a resurgence of small donors and a reduction in the sale of access to elected officials in return for campaign funds -- and a decrease in the shakedowns of donors that this practice induced. But we thought it would take several election cycles for the changes to take root. Instead this happened immediately." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Opinion|Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act|Act should be repealed|against}} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:25, March 30, 2009
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Norman J. Ornstein, Anthony Corrado |
---|---|
Source | The Washington Post |
Date | April 1, 2007 |
URL | http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/30/AR2007033002070.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Act should be repealed on the topic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.