Page values for "On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | July 20, 2022 3:47:22 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | July 20, 2022 3:47:22 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=Katie Watson |source=Chicago Tribune |date=January 21, 2022 |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-opinion-roe-v-wade-dobbs-jackson-abortion-rights-20220121-edqzvpsp7rhttnsszmvzowx4w4-story.html |quote=In its analysis of original intent, the Roe court concluded that ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’? |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 14,290 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 14,290 |
| _pageName | Page | On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’? |
| _pageTitle | String | On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’? |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization | |
| Position_fragment | String | Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
| Position | Page | Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Katie Watson |
| Source | Page | Chicago Tribune |
| Date | Date | January 21, 2022 |
| URL | URL | https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-opinion-roe-v-wade-dobbs-jackson-abortion-rights-20220121-edqzvpsp7rhttnsszmvzowx4w4-story.html |
| Quote | Text | In its analysis of original intent, the Roe court concluded that the use of the word “person” in the Constitution applies only after birth, in part because none of its 16 uses “has any possible prenatal application.” If the Dobbs court rules that it is not unconstitutional for legislatures to “pick” fetuses over women before fetuses can live independently (“viability”), it will be ruling that “No, women are not full people under the Constitution.” |
| Summary | Wikitext | On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’? by Katie Watson (Chicago Tribune, January 21, 2022) (view) |