Page values for "On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’?"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeJuly 20, 2022 3:47:22 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeJuly 20, 2022 3:47:22 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=Katie Watson |source=Chicago Tribune |date=January 21, 2022 |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-opinion-roe-v-wade-dobbs-jackson-abortion-rights-20220121-edqzvpsp7rhttnsszmvzowx4w4-story.html |quote=In its analysis of original intent, the Roe court concluded that ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringOn the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’?
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger14,290
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger14,290
_pageNamePageOn the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’?
_pageTitleString

On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’?

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,Katie Watson
SourcePageChicago Tribune
DateDateJanuary 21, 2022
URLURLhttps://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-opinion-roe-v-wade-dobbs-jackson-abortion-rights-20220121-edqzvpsp7rhttnsszmvzowx4w4-story.html
QuoteTextIn its analysis of original intent, the Roe court concluded that the use of the word “person” in the Constitution applies only after birth, in part because none of its 16 uses “has any possible prenatal application.” If the Dobbs court rules that it is not unconstitutional for legislatures to “pick” fetuses over women before fetuses can live independently (“viability”), it will be ruling that “No, women are not full people under the Constitution.”
SummaryWikitext

On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’? by Katie Watson (Chicago Tribune, January 21, 2022) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst