Information for "On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
View the protection log for this page.
Basic information
| Display title | On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’? |
| Default sort key | On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a constitutional question emerges: Are women still ‘people’? |
| Page length (in bytes) | 815 |
| Page ID | 14290 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 15:47, July 20, 2022 |
| Latest editor | Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 15:47, July 20, 2022 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Transcluded templates (2) | Templates used on this page: |