Obamacare, Two Years Later

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:22, March 28, 2012 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Michael Tanner, |source=National Review |date=March 21, 2012 |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/294000/obamacare-two-years-later-michael-tanner |quote...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Michael Tanner
Source National Review
Date March 21, 2012
URL http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/294000/obamacare-two-years-later-michael-tanner
Quote
Quotes-start.png when health-care reform was passed, we were promised that it would do three things: 1) provide health-insurance coverage for all Americans; 2) reduce insurance costs for individuals, businesses, and government; and 3) increase the quality of health care and the value received for each dollar of health-care spending. At the same time, the president and the law’s supporters in Congress promised that the legislation would not increase the federal-budget deficit or unduly burden the economy. And it would do all these things while letting those of us who were happy with our current health insurance keep it unchanged. Two years in, we can see that none of these things is true. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.