Obamacare’s Hierarchy of Privilege

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 23:01, August 26, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Mark Steyn, |source=National Review |date=August 23, 2013 |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/article/356634/obamacares-hierarchy-privilege-mark-steyn |quote=On...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Mark Steyn
Source National Review
Date August 23, 2013
URL http://www.nationalreview.com/article/356634/obamacares-hierarchy-privilege-mark-steyn
Quote
Quotes-start.png On Wednesday, the Nevada AFL-CIO passed a resolution declaring that “the unintended consequences of the ACA will lead to the destruction of the 40-hour work week.” That’s quite an accomplishment for a “health” “care” “reform” law. But the poor old union heavies who so supported Obamacare are now reduced to bleating that they should be entitled to the same opt-outs secured by big business and congressional staffers. It’s a very strange law whose only defining characteristic is that no one who favors it wants to be bound by it. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.