https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=New_START,_Old_Whine&feed=atom&action=historyNew START, Old Whine - Revision history2024-03-28T18:48:58ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.2https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=New_START,_Old_Whine&diff=13485&oldid=prevYaron Koren: Created page with "{{Item |author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board |source=Investor's Business Daily |date=November 24, 2010 |url=http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=5..."2010-11-26T14:52:47Z<p>Created page with "{{Item |author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board |source=Investor's Business Daily |date=November 24, 2010 |url=http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=5..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Item<br />
|author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board<br />
|source=Investor's Business Daily<br />
|date=November 24, 2010<br />
|url=http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=554818&p=1<br />
|quote="But in West Germany, and especially in Britain, the major opposition parties were practically — if not actually — in favor of unilateral nuclear disarmament. European democracies have a notorious history of being susceptible to the seduction of appeasement, and nearly succumbed during the Reagan-Thatcher era. A nuclear arms control pact cannot be passed blindly under the rationale that "it is in everybody's interests to work on reducing our nuclear arsenals." GOP senators want it made clear what New START really does, and what Moscow believes it does."<br />
}}<br />
{{Opinion|New START|Treaty should be ratified|against}}</div>Yaron Koren