Ms. Clinton, Thinking Small

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 04:59, June 13, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=June 13, 2007 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/12/AR2007061201691.html...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date June 13, 2007
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/12/AR2007061201691.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "As a democracy with a strong trade union movement, South Korea doesn't pose the workers' rights challenges that vex unionists in agreements with poorer countries. This deal would open the Korean market to a wide array of U.S. agricultural, industrial and cultural products and services; in fact, the political risks in South Korea are far higher than here. And it would demonstrate U.S. commitment to a vital region at a time when China is steadily gaining ground." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Agreement should be ratified on the topic U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement.