Page values for "Mr. Bush’s Stem Cell Diversion"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateJune 21, 2007 2:17:27 PM
_modificationDateJune 21, 2007 2:17:27 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=June 21, 2007 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/opinion/21thu1.html |quote="Both the Senate and the House, which passed the embryonic stem cell bill by comfortable but not veto-proof margins, need to summon ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectMr. Bush’s Stem Cell Diversion

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorThe New York Times editorial board
SourceThe New York Times
DateJune 21, 2007
URLhttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/opinion/21thu1.html
Quote"Both the Senate and the House, which passed the embryonic stem cell bill by comfortable but not veto-proof margins, need to summon the strength to override Mr. Bush’s veto, so that important research into possible cures for Parkinson’s, diabetes and other serious ailments can move ahead."
Summary

Mr. Bush’s Stem Cell Diversion by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, June 21, 2007) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicStem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007
Position_fragmentAct should be passed
PositionStem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007 / Act should be passed
Position_link

Act should be passed

Stancefor