More Troops: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(This is the real date)
Line 3: Line 3:
|author2=William Kristol
|author2=William Kristol
|source=The Weekly Standard
|source=The Weekly Standard
|date=October 2, 2006
|date=September 27, 2006
|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/734nyaea.asp
|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/734nyaea.asp
|quote="But the calls for more troops in Iraq come from soldiers training Iraqis, from soldiers trying to secure Baghdad, from soldiers in Anbar. [...] The truth is there are not enough ground forces in Iraq, and military officers are finally saying so in public."
|quote="But the calls for more troops in Iraq come from soldiers training Iraqis, from soldiers trying to secure Baghdad, from soldiers in Anbar. [...] The truth is there are not enough ground forces in Iraq, and military officers are finally saying so in public."

Revision as of 15:29, September 28, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Frederick W. Kagan
Source The Weekly Standard
Date September 27, 2006
URL http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/734nyaea.asp
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But the calls for more troops in Iraq come from soldiers training Iraqis, from soldiers trying to secure Baghdad, from soldiers in Anbar. [...] The truth is there are not enough ground forces in Iraq, and military officers are finally saying so in public." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should increase troop levels on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.