More Troops: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Fixed)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{Item
|author=Frederick W. Kagan
|author=Frederick W. Kagan, William Kristol
|author2=William Kristol
|source=The Weekly Standard
|source=The Weekly Standard
|date=October 2, 2006
|date=September 27, 2006
|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/734nyaea.asp
|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/734nyaea.asp
|quote="But the calls for more troops in Iraq come from soldiers training Iraqis, from soldiers trying to secure Baghdad, from soldiers in Anbar. [...] The truth is there are not enough ground forces in Iraq, and military officers are finally saying so in public."
|quote="But the calls for more troops in Iraq come from soldiers training Iraqis, from soldiers trying to secure Baghdad, from soldiers in Anbar. [...] The truth is there are not enough ground forces in Iraq, and military officers are finally saying so in public."
}}
}}
 
{{Opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should increase troop levels|for}}
{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should increase troop levels|for}}

Latest revision as of 12:15, March 30, 2009

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Frederick W. Kagan, William Kristol
Source The Weekly Standard
Date September 27, 2006
URL http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/734nyaea.asp
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But the calls for more troops in Iraq come from soldiers training Iraqis, from soldiers trying to secure Baghdad, from soldiers in Anbar. [...] The truth is there are not enough ground forces in Iraq, and military officers are finally saying so in public." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should increase troop levels on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.