Libyan rebels cheer, but story not over

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:16, September 1, 2011 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=USA Today editorial board, |source=USA Today |date=August 22, 2011 |url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/story/2011-08-22/Our-view-Rebels-take-L...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) USA Today editorial board
Source USA Today
Date August 22, 2011
URL http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/story/2011-08-22/Our-view-Rebels-take-Libyan-capital-but-story-is-not-over/50099020/1
Quote
Quotes-start.png The U.S. intervention, in concert with NATO and the Arab League, prevented a civilian massacre in March in the eastern city of Benghazi, allowed the rebels to regroup, and helped turn the tide of the standoff. The intervention was a high-stakes gamble about which we've been skeptical, but if ultimately successful, it can be an important step in what stands to be a long, difficult process of rebooting U.S. policy away from support for dictators and toward support for the people's democratic aspirations. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should not have intervened on the topic 2011 Libyan uprising.