Liberals are violating their principles on Keystone XL

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 21:28, February 25, 2015 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board, |source=The Washington Post |date=November 19, 2014 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-lane-liberals-are-v...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date November 19, 2014
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-lane-liberals-are-violating-their-principles-on-keystone-xl/2014/11/19/86b1c642-7009-11e4-8808-afaa1e3a33ef_story.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png Far from being “game over” for the planet, Keystone XL would not boost greenhouse gas emissions significantly, according to State Department experts. With or without Keystone XL, Canada’s oil sands will still be turned into crude oil and shipped, often by rail, to markets in the United States and elsewhere. The environmental movement’s energies — not to mention Steyer’s millions — would be far better spent elsewhere. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Pipeline should be built on the topic Keystone XL pipeline.