Legalizing Tyranny: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Updated URL)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{Item
|author=Andrew Sullivan
|author=Andrew Sullivan
|source=The Daily Dish
|source=The Daily Dish
|date=September 26, 2006
|date=September 26, 2006
|url=http://time.blogs.com/daily_dish/2006/09/legalizing_tyra.html
|url=http://dailydish.typepad.com/the_daily_dish/2006/09/legalizing_tyra.html
|quote="Whatever else this is, it is not a constitutional democracy. It is a thinly-veiled military dictatorship, subject to only one control: the will of the Great Decider. And the war that justifies this astonishing attack on American liberty is permanent, without end."
|quote="Whatever else this is, it is not a constitutional democracy. It is a thinly-veiled military dictatorship, subject to only one control: the will of the Great Decider. And the war that justifies this astonishing attack on American liberty is permanent, without end."
}}
}}
 
{{Opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Compromise bill should be passed|against}}
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Compromise bill should be passed|against}}

Latest revision as of 03:13, December 3, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Andrew Sullivan
Source The Daily Dish
Date September 26, 2006
URL http://dailydish.typepad.com/the_daily_dish/2006/09/legalizing_tyra.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Whatever else this is, it is not a constitutional democracy. It is a thinly-veiled military dictatorship, subject to only one control: the will of the Great Decider. And the war that justifies this astonishing attack on American liberty is permanent, without end." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Compromise bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.