Keep John Bolton at the United Nations

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 23:23, September 1, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) New York Daily News editorial board
Source New York Daily News
Date July 31, 2006
URL http://www.belleville.com/mld/belleville/news/editorial/15178133.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Bolton has a superb record and to deny him would send a dreadful message to the world that the president is not in charge of U.S. foreign policy. Even uglier, it would be doing the bidding of Kofi Annan and the secretary-general's enforcer Mark Malloch Brown, who has cozied up to the Democrats in the hope of dumping Bolton." Quotes-end.png

The following other items refer to this item: John Bolton deserves to remain U.N. envoy

Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.


This item argues against the position Confirmation should be filibustered on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.