Judgment at Guantanamo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Legislation now has name) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Item | ||
|author=David B. Rivkin Jr. | |author=David B. Rivkin Jr., Lee A. Casey | ||
|source=The Wall Street Journal | |source=The Wall Street Journal | ||
|date=September 9, 2006 | |date=September 9, 2006 | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="In this regard, the president's military commissions bill carefully balances the key relevant policy imperatives -- ensuring a fair trial without undermining national security -- and yet gives unlawful enemy combatants more due process than they've ever received in history. It should be promptly enacted." | |quote="In this regard, the president's military commissions bill carefully balances the key relevant policy imperatives -- ensuring a fair trial without undermining national security -- and yet gives unlawful enemy combatants more due process than they've ever received in history. It should be promptly enacted." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|for}} | |||
{{ |
Latest revision as of 12:14, March 30, 2009
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | David B. Rivkin Jr., Lee A. Casey |
---|---|
Source | The Wall Street Journal |
Date | September 9, 2006 |
URL | http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115775899800658262.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.