Page values for "Judge Hudson's flawed but restrained ruling on the health law"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateDecember 17, 2010 9:27:18 PM
_modificationDateDecember 17, 2010 9:27:18 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=December 13, 2010 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/13/AR2010121305014.html |quote="As the Obama administration argued in defending the law, "No person can guarantee that he ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectJudge Hudson's flawed but restrained ruling on the health law

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorThe Washington Post editorial board
SourceThe Washington Post
DateDecember 13, 2010
URLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/13/AR2010121305014.html
Quote"As the Obama administration argued in defending the law, "No person can guarantee that he will divorce himself entirely from the market for health-care services." Even inaction, in this situation, affects economic activity and therefore interstate commerce."
Summary

Judge Hudson's flawed but restrained ruling on the health law by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, December 13, 2010) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Position_fragmentAct should not have been passed
PositionPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should not have been passed
Position_link

Act should not have been passed

Stanceagainst