https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=Judge_Barrett_showed_she_was_learned_in_the_law;_that%E2%80%99s_not_enough&feed=atom&action=historyJudge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough - Revision history2024-03-29T08:18:02ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.2https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=Judge_Barrett_showed_she_was_learned_in_the_law;_that%E2%80%99s_not_enough&diff=32086&oldid=prevYaron Koren: Created page with "{{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board |source=Los Angeles Times |date=October 16, 2020 |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-bar..."2020-10-26T23:35:00Z<p>Created page with "{{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board |source=Los Angeles Times |date=October 16, 2020 |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-bar..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Item<br />
|author=Los Angeles Times editorial board<br />
|source=Los Angeles Times<br />
|date=October 16, 2020<br />
|url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-hearings-qualifications<br />
|quote=In another universe, her qualifications might incline us to support her nomination despite our concerns that she might vote to undermine the right to abortion or make it harder for Congress and the states to deal with the proliferation of firearms. But the circumstances in which Barrett has been nominated by President Trump make discussion of her credentials or her judicial philosophy irrelevant. Confirming her now could politicize the Supreme Court beyond the possibility of repair.<br />
}}<br />
{{Opinion|Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination|Barrett should be confirmed|against}}</div>Yaron Koren