Page values for "Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
_creationDate | October 26, 2020 11:35:00 PM |
_modificationDate | October 26, 2020 11:35:00 PM |
_creator | Yaron Koren |
_fullText | {{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board |source=Los Angeles Times |date=October 16, 2020 |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-hearings-qualifications |quote=In another universe, her qualifications might incline us to support her nomi ... |
_categories | Items |
_numRevisions | 1 |
_isRedirect | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough |
"_fileData" values
"Items" values
Author | Los Angeles Times editorial board |
Source | Los Angeles Times |
Date | October 16, 2020 |
URL | https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-hearings-qualifications |
Quote | In another universe, her qualifications might incline us to support her nomination despite our concerns that she might vote to undermine the right to abortion or make it harder for Congress and the states to deal with the proliferation of firearms. But the circumstances in which Barrett has been nominated by President Trump make discussion of her credentials or her judicial philosophy irrelevant. Confirming her now could politicize the Supreme Court beyond the possibility of repair. |
Summary | Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, October 16, 2020) (view) |
"Opinions" values
Topic | Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination |
Position_fragment | Barrett should be confirmed |
Position | Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination / Barrett should be confirmed |
Position_link | |
Stance | against |