Page values for "Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
_creationDateOctober 26, 2020 11:35:00 PM
_modificationDateOctober 26, 2020 11:35:00 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board |source=Los Angeles Times |date=October 16, 2020 |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-hearings-qualifications |quote=In another universe, her qualifications might incline us to support her nomi ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectJudge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
AuthorLos Angeles Times editorial board
SourceLos Angeles Times
DateOctober 16, 2020
URLhttps://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-hearings-qualifications
QuoteIn another universe, her qualifications might incline us to support her nomination despite our concerns that she might vote to undermine the right to abortion or make it harder for Congress and the states to deal with the proliferation of firearms. But the circumstances in which Barrett has been nominated by President Trump make discussion of her credentials or her judicial philosophy irrelevant. Confirming her now could politicize the Supreme Court beyond the possibility of repair.
Summary

Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, October 16, 2020) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
TopicAmy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination
Position_fragmentBarrett should be confirmed
PositionAmy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination / Barrett should be confirmed
Position_link

Barrett should be confirmed

Stanceagainst