Page values for "Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough"

"_pageData" values

_creationDate	October 26, 2020 11:35:00 PM
_modificationDate	October 26, 2020 11:35:00 PM
_creator	Yaron Koren
_fullText	{{Item \|author=Los Angeles Times editorial board \|source=Los Angeles Times \|date=October 16, 2020 \|url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-hearings-qualifications \|quote=In another universe, her qualifications might incline us to support her nomi ...
_categories	Items
_numRevisions	1
_isRedirect	No
_pageNameOrRedirect	Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough

Author	Los Angeles Times editorial board
Source	Los Angeles Times
Date	October 16, 2020
URL	https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-10-16/editorial-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-hearings-qualifications
Quote	In another universe, her qualifications might incline us to support her nomination despite our concerns that she might vote to undermine the right to abortion or make it harder for Congress and the states to deal with the proliferation of firearms. But the circumstances in which Barrett has been nominated by President Trump make discussion of her credentials or her judicial philosophy irrelevant. Confirming her now could politicize the Supreme Court beyond the possibility of repair.
Summary	Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, October 16, 2020) (view)

Topic	Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination
Position_fragment	Barrett should be confirmed
Position	Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination / Barrett should be confirmed
Position_link	Barrett should be confirmed
Stance	against