Page values for "It's Time to Intervene in Syria"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateApril 30, 2013 7:16:13 PM
_modificationDateApril 30, 2013 7:16:42 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=John Judis, |source=The New Republic |date=April 30, 2013 |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113068/syria-intervention-why-obama-should-authorize-force# |quote=First, there is good reason to discourage—by force, if necessary—the use of chemical weapons. After 100,000 were ki ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions2
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectIt's Time to Intervene in Syria

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorJohn Judis
SourceThe New Republic
DateApril 30, 2013
URLhttp://www.newrepublic.com/article/113068/syria-intervention-why-obama-should-authorize-force#
QuoteFirst, there is good reason to discourage—by force, if necessary—the use of chemical weapons. After 100,000 were killed in World War I from poison gas, the League of Nations in 1925 adopted a ban on their use, which even the adversaries in World War II observed. The United Nations adopted a ban of its own in 1992. Secondly, there is good reason for the United States, once it declares a “red line,” to observe it.
Summary

It's Time to Intervene in Syria by John Judis (The New Republic, April 30, 2013) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicSyrian civil war
Position_fragmentUnited States should intervene
PositionSyrian civil war / United States should intervene
Position_link

United States should intervene

Stancefor