Is Iran nuclear deal better than no deal? Yes

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:12, July 16, 2015 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=USA Today editorial board, |source=USA Today |date=July 14, 2015 |url=http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/07/14/iran-united-states-nuclear-weapons-editor...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) USA Today editorial board
Source USA Today
Date July 14, 2015
URL http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/07/14/iran-united-states-nuclear-weapons-editorials-debates/30126475/
Quote
Quotes-start.png How, for example, can it be guaranteed that, buried deep within a mountainside, Iran won't quietly build a nuclear capability that could allow it to hurtle toward a weapon? The agreement entrusts this responsibility to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations body that has, more or less effectively, monitored compliance with nuclear non-proliferation. Now, IAEA scientists and investigators will have unprecedented access, with onsite inspection and around-the-clock online monitoring of known nuclear sites. Without this pact, they will have none. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.