Iraq: Go Deep or Get Out

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:19, July 11, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Stephen Biddle |source=The Washington Post |date=July 11, 2007 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/10/AR2007071001424.html |quote="If the surge...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Stephen Biddle
Source The Washington Post
Date July 11, 2007
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/10/AR2007071001424.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "If the surge is unacceptable, the better option is to cut our losses and withdraw altogether. In fact, the substantive case for either extreme -- surge or outright withdrawal -- is stronger than for any policy between. The surge is a long-shot gamble. But middle-ground options leave us with the worst of both worlds: continuing casualties but even less chance of stability in exchange." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.