Iran deal a gamble, but no deal would be worse: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Arizona Republic editorial board, |source=The Arizona Republic |date=July 14, 2015 |url=http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/editorial/2015/07/14/iran-nuc...") |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote=The history of nuclear proliferation among nations that did not come to the bargaining table is not impressive. Would the world be a safer place if nations had recognized first India's and then Pakistan's determination to be nuclear powers? Or if they had understood better the nuclear obsession of North Korea's regime? Perhaps diplomacy would have changed nothing. But failing to negotiate ensured the ultimate result. | |quote=The history of nuclear proliferation among nations that did not come to the bargaining table is not impressive. Would the world be a safer place if nations had recognized first India's and then Pakistan's determination to be nuclear powers? Or if they had understood better the nuclear obsession of North Korea's regime? Perhaps diplomacy would have changed nothing. But failing to negotiate ensured the ultimate result. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of | {{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action|Plan is beneficial|for}} |
Latest revision as of 22:23, July 17, 2015
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | The Arizona Republic editorial board |
---|---|
Source | The Arizona Republic |
Date | July 14, 2015 |
URL | http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/editorial/2015/07/14/iran-nuclear-deal-obama/30164395/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.