In Defense of Sarbanes-Oxley: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Item | ||
|author=Paul Volcker | |author=Paul Volcker, Arthur Levitt | ||
|source=The Wall Street Journal | |source=The Wall Street Journal | ||
|date=June 14, 2004 | |date=June 14, 2004 | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="More importantly, we must not forget that U.S. markets are the best in the world because they are the best regulated. We should not engage in a race to the bottom. Instead, we should lead the world to the top, and we are. Countries are emulating our reforms -- from the new Combined Code in the U.K. to Germany's new Kodex of best practices -- and as a result, we are strengthening the global economy, not being defeated by it." | |quote="More importantly, we must not forget that U.S. markets are the best in the world because they are the best regulated. We should not engage in a race to the bottom. Instead, we should lead the world to the top, and we are. Countries are emulating our reforms -- from the new Combined Code in the U.K. to Germany's new Kodex of best practices -- and as a result, we are strengthening the global economy, not being defeated by it." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Opinion|Sarbanes-Oxley Act|Act should be reformed|against}} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:16, March 30, 2009
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | Paul Volcker, Arthur Levitt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | The Wall Street Journal | |||
| Date | June 14, 2004 | |||
| URL | http://online.wsj.com/article/SB108717805594936016.html | |||
| Quote |
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Act should be reformed on the topic Sarbanes-Oxley Act.