How should this country treat its terror suspects?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Fixed source) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed quote) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=September 20, 2006 | |date=September 20, 2006 | ||
|url=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/columnists/all/stories/DN-davis_20edi.ART.State.Edition1.3e2f11e.html | |url=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/columnists/all/stories/DN-davis_20edi.ART.State.Edition1.3e2f11e.html | ||
|quote=" We are not engaged in battle with any particular nation that might claim signatory status to the Geneva Conventions. We are not fighting any uniformed entity that remotely aspires to the pleasantries enumerated within. As such, it is tragically inane to hear United States senators whine about our obligations to afford terrorist combatants certain dignities out of fear of what enemy captors might do to us. " | |quote="We are not engaged in battle with any particular nation that might claim signatory status to the Geneva Conventions. We are not fighting any uniformed entity that remotely aspires to the pleasantries enumerated within. As such, it is tragically inane to hear United States senators whine about our obligations to afford terrorist combatants certain dignities out of fear of what enemy captors might do to us." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|for}} | {{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|for}} | ||
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed|against}} | {{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed|against}} | ||
{{opinion|McCain Detainee Amendment}} | {{opinion|McCain Detainee Amendment|Amendment should not have been passed|for}} |
Latest revision as of 15:38, September 29, 2006
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Mark Davis |
---|---|
Source | The Dallas Morning News |
Date | September 20, 2006 |
URL | http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/columnists/all/stories/DN-davis_20edi.ART.State.Edition1.3e2f11e.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.
This item argues against the position Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.
This item argues for the position Amendment should not have been passed on the topic McCain Detainee Amendment.