How should this country treat its terror suspects?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixing position) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|for}} | {{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|for}} | ||
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed|against}} | {{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed|against}} | ||
{{opinion|McCain Detainee Amendment|Amendment should not have passed|for}} | {{opinion|McCain Detainee Amendment|Amendment should not have been passed|for}} |
Revision as of 15:30, September 29, 2006
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Mark Davis |
---|---|
Source | The Dallas Morning News |
Date | September 20, 2006 |
URL | http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/columnists/all/stories/DN-davis_20edi.ART.State.Edition1.3e2f11e.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.
This item argues against the position Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.
This item argues for the position Amendment should not have been passed on the topic McCain Detainee Amendment.