Health care law winds up discouraging work, upward mobility

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 04:50, October 21, 2014 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Oklahoman editorial board, |source=The Oklahoman |date=October 16, 2014 |url=")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Oklahoman editorial board
Source The Oklahoman
Date October 16, 2014
Quotes-start.png In response to Obamacare’s incentives, [economist Casey] Mulligan estimates about 3.6 percentage points more of the workforce will reduce their work hours to between 26 and 29 hours per week than what would occur if Obamacare wasn’t the law. This group will be disproportionately female because women represent a greater percentage of those currently working 30 to 35 hours. Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.