Health Reform Mustn't Hinge On Deadlines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Marie Cocco |source=Investor's Business Daily |date=July 22, 2009 |url=http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=333152386180220 |quote="Though the surtax m') |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' to 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act') |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="Though the surtax may well be jettisoned, there are unequivocally necessary parts of the House bill that must remain. Chief among them is elimination of overpayments to insurance industry managed-care plans that serve Medicare patients. Taxpayers now spend 13% more per patient in these HMOs than they do for a patient enrolled in regular (yes, government-run!) Medicare." | |quote="Though the surtax may well be jettisoned, there are unequivocally necessary parts of the House bill that must remain. Chief among them is elimination of overpayments to insurance industry managed-care plans that serve Medicare patients. Taxpayers now spend 13% more per patient in these HMOs than they do for a patient enrolled in regular (yes, government-run!) Medicare." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion| | {{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should be passed|for}} |
Latest revision as of 14:33, March 11, 2010
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Marie Cocco |
---|---|
Source | Investor's Business Daily |
Date | July 22, 2009 |
URL | http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=333152386180220 |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.