Energy security and American jobs

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:06, February 27, 2015 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Chicago Tribune editorial board, |source=Chicago Tribune |date=March 29, 2013 |url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-03-29/opinion/ct-edit-keystone-0329-j...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Chicago Tribune editorial board
Source Chicago Tribune
Date March 29, 2013
URL http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-03-29/opinion/ct-edit-keystone-0329-jm-20130329_1_keystone-oil-keystone-xl-pipeline-u-s-senate
Quote
Quotes-start.png Yes, much of the oil delivered from Canada to the U.S. would then be refined for export, not consumed here. This is viewed in some quarters as a flaw, as if exporting American-made oil products exploits Americans. We view it as ... manufacturing. You remember manufacturing, the process in which workers take raw supplies, turn them into a finished product and sell it? Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Pipeline should be built on the topic Keystone XL pipeline.