Page values for "Electoral College is outdated"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateApril 17, 2007 2:49:33 PM
_modificationDateApril 17, 2007 2:49:33 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{item |author=The Denver Post editorial board |source=The Denver Post |date=April 9, 2007 |url=http://www.denverpost.com/opinionheadlines/ci_5628615 |quote="Under the current, winner-take-all system, each state's electoral votes go to the candidate who prevails in that state's popular vote. Si ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectElectoral College is outdated

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorThe Denver Post editorial board
SourceThe Denver Post
DateApril 9, 2007
URLhttp://www.denverpost.com/opinionheadlines/ci_5628615
Quote"Under the current, winner-take-all system, each state's electoral votes go to the candidate who prevails in that state's popular vote. Since even the smallest states get at least three electoral votes, smaller states have a disproportionately large voice. For instance, an electoral vote in Wyoming represents 164,594 people, but in California, it covers 615,848 people."
Summary

Electoral College is outdated by The Denver Post editorial board (The Denver Post, April 9, 2007) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicNational Popular Vote Interstate Compact
Position_fragmentCompact should be passed
PositionNational Popular Vote Interstate Compact / Compact should be passed
Position_link

Compact should be passed

Stancefor