Page values for "Edwards, Pelosi reveal Dems' two paths on health care"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateMarch 19, 2010 5:10:35 PM
_modificationDateMarch 19, 2010 5:10:35 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=The Dallas Morning News editorial board |source=The Dallas Morning News |date=March 17, 2010 |url=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-health_0318edi.State.Edition1.27b90a0.html |quote="Instead, the Slaughter plan would have the House vote ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectEdwards, Pelosi reveal Dems' two paths on health care

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorThe Dallas Morning News editorial board
SourceThe Dallas Morning News
DateMarch 17, 2010
URLhttp://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-health_0318edi.State.Edition1.27b90a0.html
Quote"Instead, the Slaughter plan would have the House vote only on eliminating offensive provisions like the "Cornhusker Kickback" and "Louisiana Purchase" in amendments while "deeming" the Senate bill to be passed, with no recorded vote. We can argue long into the night at the next tea (or coffee) party whether this is constitutional or that Republicans, when they ran the show, did the same thing. More important is that this is a dodgy tactic wholly unfit for a bill of such magnitude."
Summary

Edwards, Pelosi reveal Dems' two paths on health care by The Dallas Morning News editorial board (The Dallas Morning News, March 17, 2010) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Position_fragmentAct should be passed
PositionPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should be passed
Position_link

Act should be passed

Stanceagainst