Page values for "Edwards, Pelosi reveal Dems' two paths on health care"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
_creationDate | March 19, 2010 5:10:35 PM |
_modificationDate | March 19, 2010 5:10:35 PM |
_creator | Yaron Koren |
_fullText | {{Item |author=The Dallas Morning News editorial board |source=The Dallas Morning News |date=March 17, 2010 |url=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-health_0318edi.State.Edition1.27b90a0.html |quote="Instead, the Slaughter plan would have the House vote ... |
_categories | Items |
_numRevisions | 1 |
_isRedirect | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | Edwards, Pelosi reveal Dems' two paths on health care |
"_fileData" values
"Items" values
Author | The Dallas Morning News editorial board |
Source | The Dallas Morning News |
Date | March 17, 2010 |
URL | http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-health_0318edi.State.Edition1.27b90a0.html |
Quote | "Instead, the Slaughter plan would have the House vote only on eliminating offensive provisions like the "Cornhusker Kickback" and "Louisiana Purchase" in amendments while "deeming" the Senate bill to be passed, with no recorded vote. We can argue long into the night at the next tea (or coffee) party whether this is constitutional or that Republicans, when they ran the show, did the same thing. More important is that this is a dodgy tactic wholly unfit for a bill of such magnitude." |
Summary | Edwards, Pelosi reveal Dems' two paths on health care by The Dallas Morning News editorial board (The Dallas Morning News, March 17, 2010) (view) |
"Opinions" values
Topic | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act |
Position_fragment | Act should be passed |
Position | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should be passed |
Position_link | |
Stance | against |