Don't delay START

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 20:42, November 22, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=San Francisco Chronicle editorial board |source=San Francisco Chronicle |date=November 18, 2010 |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/18/ED...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) San Francisco Chronicle editorial board
Source San Francisco Chronicle
Date November 18, 2010
URL http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/18/ED5V1GDHGD.DTL
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The pact comes with side benefits just as critical as cutting back on nuclear hardware. It reels in an increasingly feisty and unpredictable Russia on a key issue. It could lead to further weapons treaties. It could win Moscow's cooperation in confronting Iran and its bomb-making ambitions. Drawing down the numbers of nukes would make it easier to persuade other nuclear nations to do the same." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Treaty should be ratified on the topic New START.