This is an opinion item.
| Author(s)
|
National Review editorial board
|
| Source
|
National Review
|
| Date
|
June 28, 2007
|
| URL
|
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=N2NmNjVhYjkzNjZlZjU5YTdlODcyZjZiZDRlNjRhNGY=
|
| Quote
|
|
"Over the last 40 years, liberal civil-rights groups have gone from advocating colorblind policies to rejecting them. They may try to describe the new ruling, perversely, as a partial repeal of Brown v. Board of Education. Justice Stephen Breyer says as much in his dissent. Yet the decision resembles Brown in a crucial respect: Starting now in Louisville and Seattle, students won’t be blocked from certain schools simply because they lack the proper melanin content."
|
|
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Parents v. Seattle.
