Discourse DB:Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(testing) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
}} | }} | ||
I am working in a sandbox now. | I am working in a sandbox now. | ||
{{Item | |||
|author=Charleston Daily Mail editorial board | |||
|source=Charleston Daily Mail | |||
|date=September 28, 2006 | |||
|url=http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/ | |||
|quote="While Ireland undoubtedly has worked hard to purge dead people from the voter registration rolls, people still manage to cast ballots in the names of the dead. Requiring a photo ID would nip that in the bud. Another Democratic talking point is that some of the poor, the elderly and the disabled do not have photo IDs. But the state already issues photo IDs to non-drivers at the Division of Motor Vehicles." | |||
}} | |||
{{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}} | |||
{{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}} | |||
{{Item | |||
|author=Charleston Daily Mail editorial board | |||
|source=Charleston Daily Mail | |||
|date=September 28, 2006 | |||
|url=http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/ | |||
|quote="While Ireland undoubtedly has worked hard to purge dead people from the voter registration rolls, people still manage to cast ballots in the names of the dead. Requiring a photo ID would nip that in the bud. Another Democratic talking point is that some of the poor, the elderly and the disabled do not have photo IDs. But the state already issues photo IDs to non-drivers at the Division of Motor Vehicles." | |||
}} | |||
{{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}} | |||
{{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}} |
Revision as of 11:18, December 15, 2010
{{#ask: }} I am working in a sandbox now.
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Charleston Daily Mail editorial board |
---|---|
Source | Charleston Daily Mail |
Date | September 28, 2006 |
URL | http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Federal Election Integrity Act.
This item refers to the previous opinion item Keep Away the Vote.
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Charleston Daily Mail editorial board |
---|---|
Source | Charleston Daily Mail |
Date | September 28, 2006 |
URL | http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Federal Election Integrity Act.
This item refers to the previous opinion item Keep Away the Vote.