Page values for "Detaining Arizona"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
_creationDate | Datetime | July 29, 2010 10:29:18 PM |
_modificationDate | Datetime | July 29, 2010 10:29:18 PM |
_creator | String | Yaron Koren |
_fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=National Review editorial board |source=National Review |date=July 29, 2010 |url=http://article.nationalreview.com/438844/detaining-arizona/the-editors |quote="“An increase in the number of requests for determinations of immigration,” she writes, “will divert resources from ... |
_categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
_numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
_isRedirect | Boolean | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | String | Detaining Arizona |
_pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 6,683 |
_lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
_pageID | Integer | 6,683 |
_pageName | Page | Detaining Arizona |
_pageTitle | String | Detaining Arizona |
_pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Topic | Page | United States of America v. Arizona | |
Position_fragment | String | Judge Bolton's ruling was justified | |
Position | Page | United States of America v. Arizona / Judge Bolton's ruling was justified | |
Position_link | Wikitext | ||
Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | National Review editorial board |
Source | Page | National Review |
Date | Date | July 29, 2010 |
URL | URL | http://article.nationalreview.com/438844/detaining-arizona/the-editors |
Quote | Text | "“An increase in the number of requests for determinations of immigration,” she writes, “will divert resources from the federal government’s other responsibilities and priorities.” Earlier in her decision, Judge Bolton sets out the different kinds of preemption, e.g. field preemption (where federal regulation is so comprehensive it “occupies the field”) and conflict preemption (where a state law is at odds with a federal law). This is something utterly different: “We can’t be bothered to answer the phone” preemption." |
Summary | Wikitext | Detaining Arizona by National Review editorial board (National Review, July 29, 2010) (view) |